
". . . one can almost say that the steady burning of the Revival,
sometimes smoldering, now blazing into flame, never quite extinguished
(even in Boston) until the Civil War had been fought, was a central mode
of this culture's search for national identity." — Perry Miller,
The Life of the Mind in America: From the Revolution to the Civil
War (1965), pp. 5-6
Despite The Life of the Mind in America winning the 1966 Pulizer
Prize in History, Miller's view of the importance of evangelical religion
in the shaping of American culture has not become conventional wisdom. This
is not to say that historians have ignored the "Second Great Awakening"
to which he was referring or the tremendous social and cultural ferment
of which it was so prominent a part. But they have not, with a few important
exceptions, carried on Miller's effort to describe the basic categories
of thought and styles of imagination through which Americans made sense
of their experiences. Instead of seeking a grand synthesis we have specialized.
We have gained much knowledge in the process and we have not worried overmuch
about how to connect our findings.
Miller nonetheless had something very important to contribute to this neglected
quest for synthesis. There was, as he expressed it, an "evangelical
basis" to the newly emerging national culture. It affected the millions
who flocked to revival meetings in the years before 1860, many of whom spoke
of their "conversion" as the central moment of their lives. Converts
flowed back into already established congregations where they demanded a
new style of preaching and prayer. They also formed new sects, splitting
established denominations in the process. They joined existing reform organizations,
such as those for temperance or anti-slavery, where they often called for
a more militant approach. They also formed their own reform societies. Beyond
such institutional impacts, they set a cultural tone. They formulated the
expectations that defined "respectability." In the process they
influenced how "ladies" and "gentlemen" spoke, how they
dressed, how they recreated. Evangelicals had an important say in determining
which books and authors became well known. It is difficult to exaggerate
their overall salience.
One way of grasping this is to think about Evangelicalism as a worldview,
a coherent way of making sense of experience. At its heart were notions
of grace and of sin. Men were sinners. American children still learned at
their mother's knee that "In Adam's fall sinned we all." But the
revival, the experience of conversion that came with the sincere acknowledgement
of one's own sinfulness and the acceptance of God's grace, enabled one to
triumph over sin.
The notion of triumph over sin is crucial. Evangelicals
did not believe, as their Anglican and Puritan forebearers had, that
they were saved through grace. They believed that grace transformed them.
In the doctrine of Perfectionism, formulated by the great revivalist Charles
Grandison Finney, in his Lectures to Professing Christians, and
in the Methodist doctrine of Holiness, Christians learned that they could
conquer sin. The drunkard could stop drinking. The adulterer could become
faithful. The slaveholder could free his slaves. The Christian could stop
using the name of the Lord in vain, could observe the Sabbath, could be
truthful, could, in short, obey God's commandments. This notion of conquest
provided an enormous energy to the converted. They could remake themselves.
And, since society was simply a collection of individuals, they could remake
it as well. Evangelicals were reformers by definition. Reform meant eradicating
sin, the sin of intemperance, the sin of slavery, violations of the Sabbath,
prostitution, gaming, and so on. For each sin there were sinners who were
responsible for the evil they wrought.
Evangelical reformers, therefore, accepted the necessity of confronting
the sinner. Often this was a matter of talking with a neighbor and expressing
one's concern over the state of his soul. There were tracts that suggested
ways in which Christians might most effectively carry out this duty. It
also meant directly confronting the rumseller and denouncing the evil he
did in trafficking in "Demon Rum." It meant publishing to the
world the evils connected with slavery, such as the breaking up of families,
the sexual license of the master, the cruel punishments. Evanigelical reform
was confrontational on principle.
Evangelicals did not have the work of cultural formation to themselves.
And they were themselves shaped by other developments such as the rapid
impact of technology and industrialization and by the sweep of political
developments, especially the ongoing success of the republic. They were
shaped by the market as well. The United States of these years was one of
the purest expressions of capitalism ever seen. The market called for discipline,
frugality, and hard work. It also led to dreams of wealth and extravagance.
It held out opportunity for individual advancement but also temptation.
Jeffersonian and Jacksonian liberalism and free market capitalism sometimes,
as in the emphasis upon individual responsibility, reinforced evangelicalism
and sometimes, as in the libertarian restraints upon government interference
with individual behavior, conflicted with it.
As Miller suggested, a good place to start in making sense of this very
complex and enormously important moment in American history and culture
is with the Revival.
The Second Great Awakening
The great figure of the Second Great Awakening was Charles Grandison Finney
(pictured at left). Not only was he the most successful and famous preacher,
he was the revival's great strategist and theologian. A revival is, Christians
agree, an outpouring of God's grace. It was Finney's claim that a minister
might nonetheless set about promoting revivals with an even greater expectation
of success than an experienced farmer might have of growing a crop. The
farmer also relied upon divine favor in that a drought or too much rain
might frustrate his efforts. This did not prevent him from studying about
seeds, soils, and other practical aspects of his calling. Similarly the
minister needed to study human psychology and the Bible. If he did, and
if he applied himself wholeheartedly to the task — and Finney claimed
that promoting revivals was the minister's sole calling — God would
reward his efforts. Finney published a "how-to" manual, Lectures
on the Revivial of Religion, based upon a series of sermons he
preached in New York City in 1835, that became the standard for generations
of revivalists.
Finney's insistence on the singular importance of revivals and his corresponding
demand that ministers be judged entirely on their success in converting
sinners earned him many critics among the "settled" clergy who
distrusted "spasmotical" religious upheavals. Well they might.
In his Lectures, he commented:
I would say nothing to undervalue, or lead you to undervalue a thorough
education for ministers. But I do not call that a thorough education,
which they get in our colleges and seminaries. It does not fit them for
their work. I appeal to all experience, whether our young men in seminaries
are thoroughly educated for the purpose of winning souls. DO THEY DO IT?
Everybody knows they do not. Look at the reports of the Home Missionary
Society. If I recollect right, in 1830, the number of conversions in connection
with the labors of the missionaries of that society did not exceed five
to each missionary. I believe the number has increased since, but is still
exceedingly small to what it would have been had they been fitted by a
right course of training for their work. I do not say this to reproach
them, for from my heart I pity them, and I pity the church for being under
the necessity of supporting ministers so trained, or none at all. They
are the best men the Missionary Society can obtain. I suppose, of course,
that I shall be reproached for saying this. But it is too true and too
painful to be concealed. Those fathers who have the training of our young
ministers are good men, but they are ancient men, men of another age and
stamp, [different?] from what is needed in these days of excitement, when
the church and world are rising to new thought and action. Those dear
fathers will not, I suppose, see this; and will perhaps think hard of
me for saying it; but it is the cause of Christ.
When Finney came into a community he completely monopolized its religious
and social life. Everyone, including local "infidels" (unbelievers)
and skeptics, came to hear him. A former lawyer, Finney spoke as if addressing
a jury. In plain language he would marshall the evidence of his listeners'
sinfulness, explore their pet ways of excusing themselves to themselves,
and, when he had them "convicted" in their own minds, explain
the path to salvation. This was the critical moment. Sinners who wanted
to be saved had to act. Specifically, the sinner had to approach the "anxious
seat" at the front of the church. There sinners had to make a public
accounting of their sins. The person who hung back out of fear of what friends
and neighbors would think was, Finney explained, still in love with his
or her sin. He first introduced the anxious bench in Rochester in 1830.
He recalled in his Memoir:
I had sometimes asked persons in the congregation to stand up; but this
I had not frequently done. However, in studying upon the subject, I had
often felt the necessity of some measure that would bring sinners to a
stand. From my own experience and observation I had found, that with the
higher classes especially, the greatest obstacle to be overcome was their
fear of being known as anxious inquirers. They were too proud to take
any position that would reveal them to others as anxious for their souls.
I had found also that something was needed, to make the impression on
them that they were expected at once to give up their hearts; something
that would call them to act, and act as publicly before the world, as
they had in their sins; something that would commit them publicly to the
service of Christ. When I had called them simply to stand up in the public
congregations I found that this had a very good effect; and so far as
it went, it answered the purpose for which it was intended. But after
all, I had felt for some time, that something more was necessary to bring
them out from among the mass of the ungodly, to a public renunciation
of their sinful ways, and a public committal of themselves to God.
At Rochester, if I recollect right, I first introduced this measure;
This was years after the cry had been raised of new measures. [There]
I made a call, I think for the first time, upon all that class of persons
whose convictions were so ripe that they were willing to renounce their
sins and give themselves to God, to come forward to certain seats which
I requested to be vacated, and offer themselves up to God, while we made
them subjects of prayer. . . .
The minister, Finney pointed out, had to choose this moment of truth carefully.
Too soon, and the sinner would not yet be sufficiently convinced of the
magnitude of his guilt. Too late, and he would be emotionally drained and
unable to act. If the minister chose the right moment, however, first one
or two sinners, often well-known in the community for their skepticism or
infidelity, would approach the anxious bench. Then a few more would follow,
then still more, and then the rest. At moments of such intense emotional
fervor the Spirit, Finney argued as had Jonathan Edwards, could physically
overpower members of the congregation. Some might faint, some cry out, some
fall to the floor. Tears often flowed, tears of joy. Converts testified
that they experienced a sudden sense of exultation. Many described it as
a feeling of being borne aloft. Others described it as a flood of light
completely enveloping them. All said it was the most profound experience
of their lives. Converts could not doubt the genuineness of their experience.
To those who did doubt they could reply that, were they to be converted
themselves, their doubts would disappear.
What were born-again Christians to do once the revival ended? Finney exhorted
them to join a church, in the first place. A Presbyterian minister himself, Finney
did not seek to get them to join his own denomination. Rather they should
choose a church with a minister who preached sin and salvation and who would
keep their new sense of religious dedication alive. As a result, the Awakening
could have unpredictable effects on established congregations. In the best
case, and Finney recounts numerous examples, the settled minister had invited
the revivalist and cooperated fully in his labors. The new converts then
flocked to his church. Sometimes, however, they left other congregations
to do so so that, even though the total number of church members increased,
individual congregations suffered losses. In still other cases, church members
stayed in their original churches but demanded a more forceful and effective
style of preaching. This could lead to splits when other members continued
to support the pastor.
Converts also needed to alter their lives, Finney preached. It had been
their old lives which had led them to disregard salvation. Now that they
had found it, they had to change those old lives. Again, Finney did not
tell them exactly what they should do. They might join a reform organization,
he would say. That would be fine, provided they were active members. They
might start organizations of their own. The point, he insisted, was that
the convert live a new life. The converted were to conquer sin. The drunkard
would become sober, the profligate chaste. Moral perfection was attainable,
Finney proclaimed.
. . . I once knew an individual who was a slave to the use of tobacco.
At length he became convinced that it was a sin for him to use it, and
the struggle against it finally drove him to God in such an agony of prayer,
that he got the victory at once over the appetite, and never had the least
desire for it again. I am not now giving you philosophy, but FACTS. I
have heard of individuals over whom a life of sin had given to certain
appetites a perfect mastery, but in time of revival they have been subdued
into perfect quiescence, and these appetites have ever after been as dead
as if they had no body. I suppose the fact is, that the mind may be so
occupied and absorbed with greater things, as not to give a thought to
the things that would revive the vicious appetite. If a drunkard goes
by a grogery, or sees people drinking, and allows his mind to run upon
it, the appetite will be awakened. The wise man, therefore, tells him
to "Look not upon the wine when it is red." But there is no
doubt that any appetite of the body may be subdued, if a sufficient impression
is made upon the mind to break it up.
Since perfection was within reach, nothing less would do. It was not enough
to control public behavior. It was necessary to eradicate sin. This doctrine
is known as Perfectionism.
"Christian perfection is . . . perfect obedience to the law of God."
There is a pertinacious unwillingness in sinners to become Christians,
and in Christians to become perfect, or to come up to the full perfection
required both by the law and gospel. Sinners may strongly wish to become
Christians, and Christians may strongly wish or desire to be rid of all
their sins, and may pray for it, even with agony. They may think they
are willing to be perfect, but they deceive themselves. They may feel,
in regard to their sins taken all together, or in the abstract, as if
they are willing to renounce them all. But take them up in the detail,
one by one, and there are many sins they are unwilling to give up. They
wrestle against sin in general, but cling to it in the detail.
I have known cases of this kind where individuals will break down in
such a manner that they think they never will sin again; and then perhaps
in one hour, something will come up that they are ready to fight for the
indulgence, and need to be broken down again and again. Christians actually
need to be hunted from one sin after another, in this way, before they
are willing to give them up, and after all, are unwilling to give up all
sins. When they are truly willing to give up all sin, when they have no
will of their own, but merge their own will entirely in the will of God,
then their bonds are broken. When they will yield absolutely to God's
will, then they are filled with all the fulness of God.
After all, the true point of inquiry is this: Have I any right to expect
to be perfect in this world? Is there any reason for me to believe that
I can be so completely subdued, that my soul shall burn with a steady
flame, and I shall love God wholly, up to what the law requires? That
it is a real duty, no one can deny. But the great query is, Is it attainable?
I answer, Yes, I believe it is.
Perfectionism, and its Methodist equivalent, the holiness theology of Phoebe
Palmer (see below), contributed to a highly distinctive style of reform. Social
problems, from slavery to prostitution to drunkenness, were sins. All could
and should be eliminated. The answer to slavery was immediate emancipation.
The answer to drunkenness was prohibition.
By
the 1830s revival converts were seeking to galvanize the "benevolent
empire," as the collection of voluntary associations including the
American Bible Society, the American Tract Society, and the American
Home Mission Society was known. They sometimes blended into established
institutions, volunteering to lead Sunday School classes, for example.
At other times they proved highly disruptive. Finney converts Arthur
and Lewis Tappan, prominent New York merchants, financed an
Anti-Slavery Society which funded abolitionist agents along the model
of the Home Missionary Society. Many of the early abolition activists,
such as Theodore Dwight Weld, were also Finney converts. Their doctrine
of "immediate emancipation" was highly controversial, even divisive.
Weld had turned to anti-slavery activism while a student at Lane
Seminary in Cincinnati. Lane's president was Lyman Beecher, another
revivalist but one less impatient with the settled clergy than Finney.
He had opposed Finney's revival campaign in Boston and now sought to
persuade Weld and some other students to delay their plans to work with
the free Black community in Cincinnati. Lane's trustees would not
support anything so controversial, he told them. But, if Weld and the
others would only give him the opportunity, he would bring the trustees
around in a year or so. Weld and his colleagues summarily refused to
accommodate prevailing prejudices and marched off to found Oberlin
where Finney took up residence as professor of theology and president.
The episode nicely illustrates the differences between moderate
reformers like Beecher, who sought to strengthen the social order, and
zealots like Weld and Finney, who sought to extirpate sin. Advocates of
benevolence shared with revival converts the language of sin. This put
them at a rhetorical disadvantage when arguing with radicals. It is
difficult to make the case for practical considerations and constraints
when one's opponent stands upon the principle of no compromise with
evil.